Subjective Reality

Imagine a world more open

41,801 notes

Women are afraid of meeting a serial killer. Men are afraid of meeting someone fat.

When Strangers Click, a 2011 documentary about online dating.

It reminds me of that famous Margaret Atwood quote: “Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them.” It also reminds me of something written by one of the mods of Sex Worker Problems: “Misandry irritates. Misogyny kills.”

 

(via plasticbags)

(Source: tealeafprincess, via stfuconservatives)

250 notes

politicalprof:

This is when my social science PhD soul goes mad.
1. As I’ve addressed elsewhere, it’s not my job to support your argument on your behalf. If you think guns save lots of people every day, start a series of counterposts to my “Gunmerica” posts. (Good luck: you won’t find them.)
2. “Balance” in no way, shape or form depends on my presenting “facts” disconnected from the social and political contexts in which those “facts” exist. When the evidence is overwhelming one way, it is absurd to create a false balance by suggesting there is meaningful counterevidence to the predominant point of view. (See the global warming “controversy” for a prime example of how “balance” perverts insight.)
And the evidence regarding guns and gun ownership is overwhelming. You are vastly more likely to be hurt or killed by a firearm you, a family member or a friend owns than you are to be saved by one. A huge number of the weapons obtained illegally in this country are stolen from homes of people who worry more about quick access to a weapon should their home be robbed (which will likely happen when they’re not home), than they do about how easy it is for a thief to steal an unlocked weapon. 

The list of evidence and facts about the ills of gun ownership —particularly handgun ownership — goes on and on. My Gunmerica posts stand as another form of evidence: the casual way lives get damaged and destroyed by easy access to guns.

Will this evidence matter to the gun people? Of course they won’t: such people are lost in the fantasy of the citizen militia(man) gunning down the bad guy like Dead Eye Dick. Evidence is irrelevant in such cases.
But don’t ask me to give up my analytic eye in the name of false “balance.” If you wish to make the case you want me to make, go make it. 
I dare you. Heck, I double dawg dare you.
And good luck.

politicalprof:

This is when my social science PhD soul goes mad.

1. As I’ve addressed elsewhere, it’s not my job to support your argument on your behalf. If you think guns save lots of people every day, start a series of counterposts to my “Gunmerica” posts. (Good luck: you won’t find them.)

2. “Balance” in no way, shape or form depends on my presenting “facts” disconnected from the social and political contexts in which those “facts” exist. When the evidence is overwhelming one way, it is absurd to create a false balance by suggesting there is meaningful counterevidence to the predominant point of view. (See the global warming “controversy” for a prime example of how “balance” perverts insight.)

And the evidence regarding guns and gun ownership is overwhelming. You are vastly more likely to be hurt or killed by a firearm you, a family member or a friend owns than you are to be saved by one. A huge number of the weapons obtained illegally in this country are stolen from homes of people who worry more about quick access to a weapon should their home be robbed (which will likely happen when they’re not home), than they do about how easy it is for a thief to steal an unlocked weapon. 

The list of evidence and facts about the ills of gun ownership —particularly handgun ownership — goes on and on. My Gunmerica posts stand as another form of evidence: the casual way lives get damaged and destroyed by easy access to guns.

Will this evidence matter to the gun people? Of course they won’t: such people are lost in the fantasy of the citizen militia(man) gunning down the bad guy like Dead Eye Dick. Evidence is irrelevant in such cases.

But don’t ask me to give up my analytic eye in the name of false “balance.” If you wish to make the case you want me to make, go make it. 

I dare you. Heck, I double dawg dare you.

And good luck.

689 notes

inthesetimesmag:

Out of the tragedy of the massive garment factory collapse in Bangladesh, workers have now won two major reforms: 1) A panel to raise the minimum wage in the garment industry and 2) The right to form trade unions without prior permission from factory owners.Still, more pressure—and responsibility—need to be placed upon America’s big-brand companies to win further protections.
Two Wins for Bangladesh Garment Workers, But the Fight Isn’t Over

inthesetimesmag:

Out of the tragedy of the massive garment factory collapse in Bangladesh, workers have now won two major reforms: 

1) A panel to raise the minimum wage in the garment industry and 

2) The right to form trade unions without prior permission from factory owners.

Still, more pressure—and responsibility—need to be placed upon America’s big-brand companies to win further protections.

Two Wins for Bangladesh Garment Workers, But the Fight Isn’t Over

(via stfuconservatives)

1,918 notes

Masses of people think that feminism is always and only about women seeking to be equal to men. And a huge majority of these folks think feminism is anti-male. Their misunderstanding of feminist politics reflects the reality that most folks learn about feminism from patriarchal mass media.
bell hooks (via ceedling)

(Source: dagseoul, via upworthy)

64 notes

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has struck down Arizona's 20-week abortion ban.

shortformblog:

The three judge panel ruled that the 20-week ban violates the constitutional right to receive an abortion, as stipulated by Roe v. Wade — fetal viability (that is, a fetus’ ability to survive outside the womb) is generally considered to begin around 24 weeks into a typical 9 month pregnancy. Nine other states have similar (in some cases even more restrictive) bans in varying states of legal challenge.

189 notes

Before Deadly Tornado Hit, Oklahoma Senators Worked To Undermine Disaster Relief

thepoliticalfreakshow:

Oklahoma residents will now turn to government assistance for emergency disaster aid after a tornado ripped through the state on Monday, leaving dozens dead and tearing apart hundreds of buildings. But the same night that many residents lost their homes, Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) told CQ Roll Callinsisted he would “absolutely” require any federal disaster aid to be offset by other budget cuts. He later clarified on Tuesday, promising, “I can assure Oklahomans that any and all available aid will be delivered without delay.”

Both of the state’s senators, Sen. James Inhofe (R) and Coburn, however, have long worked to undermine the Federal Emergency Management Agency, even though their state heavily relies on disaster aid:

– In September 2011, Coburn offered an amendment to offset $6.9 billion in FEMA funding.

– Coburn voted in 2011 against funding FEMA after it ran out of money, because, in his words, funding FEMA would have been “unconscionable.” Inhofe did not vote. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid fired back at Republicans blocking a bill for necessary funding to FEMA.

– Inhofe proposed removing grants for storm shelter programs coordinating with FEMA, and instead provide individuals with tax breaks.

– Coburn criticized items in Sandy disaster relief such as $12.9 billion for disaster mitigiation and $366 million for Amtrak as “wasteful spending.”

– After Hurricane Sandy, Inhofe and Coburn voted against a bill for $50.5 billion in Hurrican Sandy disaster relief.

– Coburn demanded that $5.25 billion in FEMA grant funds be reallocated because of sequestration in April 2013.

A spokesman told the Huffington Post that Coburn has supported offsets for the Oklahoma City bombing recovery effort, which tapped funds not yet appropriated.

Oklahoma and Texas rank as the top two states in FEMA disaster declarations; combined, they account for more than a quarter of declared disasters since 2009. So it doesn’t come as a surprise that the senators have requested disaster aid for severe storms and drought, even though Coburn is willing to hold up relief with his demands.

The average citizen doesn’t realize how inconvenienced they are by the actions of our Congress. That the prices, the efficiency, the safety of transportation and other amenities has drastically changed since Sandy… and we just go on… which makes us resilient, but at the same time, our government failed us… aid was not provided quickly enough and we are divided country…. worried state by state about our own.

(via stfuconservatives)

39 notes

Fox so-called News is heavily populated by leftovers from the Bush administration. Former political hit-man Karl Rove, former press secretary Dana Perino, and former Defense Secretary Don Rumsfeld are all over the network. And they’re all yelling about how terrible the Obama Administration is. I have a very simple message for them. In the inimitable words of Rush Limbaugh: Shut up.
Memo to Bush Administration Leftovers on Fox: Shut Up (via azspot)

(via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)

4,446 notes

Under the current ‘tyranny of slenderness’ women are forbidden to become large or massive; they must take up as little space as possible. The very contours of a woman’s body takes on as she matures - the fuller breasts and rounded hips - have become distateful. The body by which a woman feels herself judged and which by rigorous discipline she must try to assume is the body of early adolescence, slight and unformed, a body lacking flesh or substance, a body in whose very contours the image of immaturity has been inscribed. The requirement that a woman maintain a smooth and hairless skin carries further the theme of inexperience, for an infantilized face must accompany her infantilized body, a face that never ages or furrows its brow in thought. The face of the ideally feminine woman must never display the marks of character, wisdom, and experience that we so admire in men.
Sandra Lee Bartky, Foucault, Femininity, and the Modernization of Patriarchal Power (via sociophilia)

(via stfuconservatives)